Executive Summary
|
None of the radionuclides detected in
any of the samples collected during the second quarter of 2002
could be directly linked with INEEL activities. Levels of detected
radionuclides were no different than values measured at other
locations across the United States or were consistent with levels
measured historically at the INEEL. All detected radionuclide
concentrations were well below guidelines set by the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) and regulatory standards established by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for protection of
the public. (See Table ES-1.) |
This report for the second quarter, 2002,
contains results from the Environmental Surveillance, Education and
Research (ESER) Program’s monitoring of the Department of Energy’s Idaho
National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory’s (INEEL) offsite
environment, April 1 through May 30, 2002. All sample types (media) and
the sampling schedule followed during 2002 are listed in
Appendix A. Specifically, this report
contains the results for the following:
- Air sampling, including air filters and charcoal cartridges,
atmospheric moisture, and 10-micron particulate matter (PM10);
- Water sampling, including precipitation, surface water, and
drinking water;
- Agricultural product sampling, including milk, sheep, and large
game;
- Measurement of external exposure, using environmental dosimetry.
Results are presented in this report with an analytical uncertainty
term, 2s, where “s” is an estimate of the population standard deviation
(s),
assuming a Guassian distribution. The result plus or minus (±) the
uncertainty term represents the 95 confidence interval. That is, there
is 95 percent confidence that the real concentration in the sample lies
somewhere between the measured concentration minus the uncertainty term
and the measured concentration plus the uncertainty term. Results that
are greater than the 2s uncertainty are considered “detected”.
At no time during the second quarter were
weekly, monthly, or quarterly gross alpha or gross beta concentrations
in air for Boundary locations statistically higher than corresponding
data for Distant locations, as one would expect if the INEEL were a
significant source of radionuclide contamination. During the second
quarter, analysis of charcoal cartridges in ten-cartridge batches for
iodine-131 (131I) did not detect any 131I above
the respective 2s values. Selected quarterly composite air filter
samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides, strontium-90 (90Sr),
plutonium-238 (238Pu), plutonium-239/240 (239/240Pu),
and americium-241 (241Am). Nine samples collected from air
monitoring stations located at Arco, Arco QA, Atomic City, Blackfoot
CMS, Blue Dome, Dubois, Main Gate, Mud Lake, and Jackson, Wyoming showed
at least one human-made radionuclide greater than its related 2s value.
These values are within the range of those measured in the past and are
likely due to collection on the filter of resuspended fallout particles.
All results were far less than their respective DOE Derived
Concentration Guide (DCG) values.
Twenty-one atmospheric moisture samples were obtained during the second
quarter of 2002. However, only eleven of the samples were determined by
the analytical laboratory to produce valid results: five from Atomic
City and six from Idaho Falls. All results exceeded their respective 2s
values. The maximum value was well below the DCG for tritium in water.
The ESER Program operates three PM10 samplers, one each at
Rexburg, Blackfoot, and Atomic City. Sampling of PM10 is
informational as no analyses are conducted for contaminants. PM10
concentrations were well below all health standard levels for all
samples. The maximum 24-hour concentration was 46.8 µg/m3 on
May 19, 2002, in Atomic City.
Little precipitation occurred during the second quarter of 2002. Only
five samples, two monthly composite samples from the Central Facilities
Area (CFA), one monthly composite sample from Idaho Falls and two weekly
samples from the Experimental Field Station (EFS) on the INEEL. No
tritium was detected above the respective 2s values in any of the
samples.
Fourteen drinking water samples and one duplicate were collected from
selected taps throughout southeast Idaho. Samples were analyzed for
gross alpha, gross beta, and tritium (3H). None of the
samples exceeded the 2s value for gross alpha. Gross beta was measured
at concentrations above the 2s value in eleven of the samples collected.
The maximum gross beta concentration measured was from Minidoka and was
below the EPA screening. Levels of gross alpha and gross beta observed
are not unusual given the basaltic terrain.
Only
the drinking water samples from Howe and Aberdeen were above the 2s
level for tritium. The level of tritium detected in the samples from
Howe and Aberdeen that were above 2s were much lower than the EPA limit.
The measured levels were also within the range of background tritium
that exists throughout the world. All values are similar to those
recorded in previous years, and are well below the regulatory standards
for drinking water.
Five surface water samples and one duplicate sample were collected from
locations throughout southeast Idaho and analyzed for tritium, gross
alpha, and gross beta. None of the results for either tritium or gross
alpha analyses were above their 2s values. Results for gross beta for
three of the five surface water samples were greater than their
associated 2s values. The gross beta values were lower than the EPA
screening level and below the DCG values and are consistent with
historical measurements.
Milk samples were collected weekly in Idaho Falls and monthly at eight
other locations around the INEEL. All samples were analyzed for gamma
emitting radionuclides. No 131I or cesium-137 (137Cs)
was detected in any of the collected samples.
Individual sheep from three separate flocks were sampled including a
control flock in Dubois from the Experimental Sheep Station, a flock
from a southern INEEL allotment, and a flock from a northern INEEL
allotment. Two sheep were taken from each flock. Thyroid, muscle, and
liver tissue were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting
radionuclides. No 131I was found in any of the samples.
Analysis for 137Cs showed results greater than 2s in three
samples from three different animals: one liver sample collected from an
animal on the Northern allotment, and two muscle samples collected from
each animal from the Southern allotment. All concentrations of 137Cs
were similar to those found in both onsite and offsite sheep samples
during recent years.
No large game animals were sampled during the second quarter of 2002.
Environmental dosimeter locations are divided into Boundary and Distant
groupings. Boundary exposure rates ranged from 0.30 to 0.38 mR/day. The
overall average was 0.33 mR/day. The Distant set ranged from 0.30 to
0.41 mR/day. The average Distant value was 0.34 mR/day. No statistical
difference existed between Boundary and Distant locations. All exposure
results are consistent with those measured historically.
No radionuclides in any of the samples taken during the second quarter
of 2002 could be directly linked with INEEL activities. Levels of
detected radionuclides were no different than values measured at other
locations across the United States and consistent with levels measured
in the past in this area. Radionuclide concentrations in all of the
samples collected and analyzed during the second quarter, 2002 were
below guidelines set by both the DOE and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for protection of the public.
Table ES-1 Summary of results for the second quarter of 2002.
|
Media |
Sample Type |
Analysis |
Results |
|
Air |
Filters |
Gross alpha, gross beta, 131I |
There were no statistical
differences noted for weekly, monthly or quarterly gross alpha or
gross beta concentrations measured at INEEL, Boundary, and Distant
locations. |
|
|
|
Gamma emitting radionuclides,
select actinides, 90Sr |
Quarterly composite samples had
measurable levels of 241Am and 239/240Pu in
samples from Arco, Arco QA, Atomic City, Blackfoot CMS, Blue Dome,
Dubois, Main Gate, Mud Lake, and Jackson, WY. Results were well
below DOE DCGs and historical measurements. |
|
|
Charcoal Cartridge |
Iodine-131 |
No detections of 131I
were made during the quarter. |
|
|
PM10 |
Particulate matter |
Thirty-eight total samples were
collected from three locations. No regulatory limits were
exceeded. |
|
Atmospheric Moisture |
Liquid |
Tritium |
Twenty-six atmospheric moisture samples were collected. Only
eleven of the results were determined to be valid by the
laboratory and were measurable tritium concentrations. No result
exceeded the DCG for tritium in air. |
|
Precipitation |
Liquid |
Tritium |
No
measurable concentrations of tritium were recorded during the
quarter. |
|
Drinking
Water |
Liquid |
Gross
alpha, gross beta, tritium |
No gross
alpha activity was detected in any sample. Gross beta activity
was measured in eleven of fifteen samples. The maximum
concentration was well below the screening level estimated using
the EPA Safe Drinking Water Act limit. Tritium was detected in two
samples at concentrations many times lower than the EPA screening
level. |
|
Surface
Water |
Liquid |
Gross
alpha, gross beta, tritium |
No
tritium or gross alpha activity was detected in any sample. Gross
beta activity was measured above the 2s values in three of five samples.
All concentrations were below EPA and DOE limits. |
|
Milk |
Liquid |
Iodine-131, gamma emitting radionuclides |
Iodine-131 and 137Cs were not detected in any sample
during the quarter. |
|
Sheep |
Tissue |
Iodine-131, gamma emitting radionuclides |
Cs-137
was detected in three samples: two muscle samples from sheep
collected off the Southern allotment and one liver from a Northern
allotment animal. All results were within historical
measurements. |
|
Game
Animals |
Tissue |
Iodine-131, gamma emitting radionuclides |
No game
animals were collected during this quarter. |
|
Environmental Radiation |
TLD |
Ambient
ionizing radiation |
Values
were consistent with expected exposures given the altitude and
location of the TLD's. There were no statistical differences
between Boundary and Distant location results. |
Back |